Magdaleno pena biography of martin johnson

In complainant Magdaleno M. The defendants challenged the advance execution before the CA with the result that the latter rendered judgment, stopping and annulling the same. On motion, however, the CA amended its decision and allowed execution pending appeal because the bank in the meantime ran into financial difficulties. The Court granted the motion by its resolution of November 19, that reads:.

Considering the motion of petitioner Urban Bank, Inc. Magdaleno M. Urban Bank, Inc. Urban Bank itself filed an identical motion for clarification dated August 6, Annex B had on its left margin the handwritten note that says: "10 AC. Carpio to whom the corresponding items were assigned as Member-in-Charge. Consequently, the resolution bearing that date, which granted the motion, had been falsified.

Magdaleno Pena did you see me talking to you?

The purpose of the hearing was to find out where he got his Annexes and if they were authentic. The members of the Division told him outright that, while his Annex B was a copy of the printed agenda, the handwritten notations on the same did not belong to any of the Justices of the First Division. Manuel Singson, got an advance copy of the November 13 resolution, and faxed it to him on November 19, , days before the Court released it for mailing.

Apart from disposing of the principal actions on their merits, in the per curiam Decision of the Court en banc promulgated on April 17, in A.